|
|
Volume
based Technical Analysis
(terminology and basic principles)
Terminology
Before starting our discussion on how volume patterns
drive index reversals, we need to define several terms.
Volume Moving Averages (VMA): Every trader
is familiar with moving averages of securities prices, perhaps the most
frequently used technical indicator. We simply apply the concept to
volume, rather than to price, and plot Volume Moving Averages (VMA)
that range in duration from as short as a few minutes to as long as
several months. However, there is a slight twist to this: Volume
activity typically follows certain predictable patterns throughout the
trading day, with high levels prevalent immediately after the open,
lower values around noon, and increased levels once more toward the
close. We call this pattern the “time factor”. Unfortunately, the
time factor provides a rather distorted picture of the daily volume
activity. It makes it difficult to differentiate those volume events,
which are truly significant, from those that are simply part of the
normal daily fluctuations. We have solved the time factor issue by
normalizing volume data before charting it. Charting normalized
volume allows a much clearer determination of whether or not
volume levels are spiking above normal levels, an aspect that is at the
core of our methodology.
We are particularly interested in the appearance of
large peaks (“spikes”) in the VMA - known as VMA spikes – and how
an index reacts when they are generated. Sudden VMA surges are
indicative of bursts of significant buying or selling activity. As such
spikes occur, we determine whether the index is moving up or down at
that time. If the direction is up, we call the associated volume surge a
resistive VMA spike; if the index direction is down, we
label the spike a supportive VMA spike. In the absence of
distinct volume spikes, we still call any volume generated as the index
is moving up resistive volume, as it moves down, supportive
volume.
Basic principles
The most basic premise of volume analytics is that we
can always anticipate an index will react to (significant) volume spikes
– as a rule, resistive volume spikes will force a downward move in the
index; supportive volume spikes will generate upward index momentum.
This basic assertion must be qualified by two key questions:
- What determines the extent and characteristics
of an anticipated move: Will it be short-lived or have “staying
power” over the mid- to long-term? Will it be gradual, sudden, or
volatile?
- What determines when an anticipated move
will most likely occur: Will it happen immediately, promptly,
or will there be a certain time lag (a “delayed volume reaction”)?
Our research shows that the answers to these questions
vary considerably, depending on (a) the general market context, and (b)
the technical characteristics of the actual volume spike(s) being
analyzed. Therefore, in order to get the most value from volume
analytics, it must always be placed in the proper context:
Market context: Where in
the larger market picture do supportive / resistive VMA spikes appear:
During short-term pullbacks within a larger uptrend? As part of
short-term upside corrections within a larger downtrend? At the presumed
end of a weakening long-term trend? At the beginning of a new trend or
somewhere in its middle? During distinct trend runs or in markets with
choppy sideways trading action (i.e., in support / resistance
corridors)?
Technical considerations:
When analyzing a VMA spike, consider its magnitude, both
vertically (the height of a thrust) and horizontally (its width or
breadth). Comparatively larger and / or wider spikes obviously carry
more weight. Caution must be exercised when analyzing volume spikes on a
short time frame, as their potential impacts on mid- or long-term trends
can easily be misjudged. A noteworthy spike appearing on a 5-minute
chart could well affect an index in the short-term, but it may not
necessarily have much of an impact on the prevailing long-term trend. A
spike may look imposing and appear to be critical on 1-day chart, yet it
may not loom as large on a 30-day chart or even seem significant at all
on a 60-day chart.
|
|

|